Ten Years Since Nirbhaya: A Critical Analysis of Retributive Justice in Addressing Sexual Violence

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Jun 2, 2022
https://doi.org/10.54945/gavps.v1i1.6
Download
PDF HTML
Statistic

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...
Volume 1, Issue 1, June 2022

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Garima Jain
Jindal School of Psychology and Counselling, O.P. Jindal Global University, Sonipat
Ankita Mishra
Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield

Abstract

Following the infamous Nirbhaya gang rape incident in December, 2012, a host of rape law reforms were introduced in India, including stringent punishment and death penalty under the Criminal Law Amendment Act and Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act. This article questions the effectiveness of such punitive measures in dealing with sexual violence. While, the legislative reforms offer tougher sentencing, they place less emphasis on victims’ rights and also tend to ignore the social context in which sexual violence occurs. The present paper offers the critique of punitive populism of the legislation through four discourses: Rape as ‘loss of honour’, Rapists as a ‘monster’ syndrome, Perspectives of victimsurvivors and Retributive justice and marginalised identities. By exploring victim-survivors’ participation, restorative and transformational practices and acknowledging the larger socio-cultural context in which sexual violence takes place, this article sheds light on a range of strategies to address sexual violence from the perspectives of victims.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Jain, G. ., & Mishra, A. . (2022). Ten Years Since Nirbhaya: A Critical Analysis of Retributive Justice in Addressing Sexual Violence. Global Advances in Victimology and Psychological Studies, 1(1), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.54945/gavps.v1i1.6
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Armatta, J. (2018). Ending Sexual Violence Through Transformative Justice. Interdisciplinary Journal of Partnership Studies, 5(1), 4-4. https://doi.org/10.24926/ ijps.v5i1.915
  2. Barry, E. (2017, May 5). In rare move, death sentence in Delhi gang rape case is upheld. The New York Times. Retrieved from: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/05/ world/asia/death-sentence-delhi-gang-rape.html
  3. Baxi, P. (2013). Public Secrets of Law: Rape Trials in India. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acpro :oso/9780198089568.001.0001
  4. Bernstein, E. (2012). Carceral politics as gender justice? The “traffic in women” and neoliberal circuits of crime, sex, and rights. Theory and Society, 41(3), 233-259. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s11186-012-9165-9
  5. Brooks-Hay, O. (2020). Doing the “Right Thing”? Understanding Why Rape Victim-Survivors Report to the Police. Feminist Criminology, 15(2), 174-195. https:// doi.org/10.1177/1557085119859079
  6. Brown, J. M., & Horvath, M. A. H. (2009). Do you believe her and is it real rape? (M. A. H. Horvath & J. M. Brown, Eds.; pp. 325-342). Willan. https://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/6999/
  7. Bumiller, K. (1987). Rape as a Legal Symbol: An Essay on Sexual Violence and Racism Symposium: Excluded Voices: Realities in Law and Law Reform. University of Miami Law Review, 42(1), 75-92.
  8. Carroll, C. P. (2022). Reinvestigating the Sexual Violence “Justice Gap” in the Swedish Criminal Justice System: Victim-Centered Alternatives to the Criminal Trial. Feminist Criminology, 15570851221077672. https://doi.org/10.1177/15570851221077673
  9. Chamberlain, G., & Bhabani, S. (2017). Five years after the gang-rape and murder of Jyoti Singh, what has changed for women in India? The Observer. Retrieved from: https://www.theguardian.com/society/2017/dec/03/ five-years-after-gang-murder-jyoti-singh-how-hasdelhi- changed
  10. Chapman, J. (2014). Violence against Women in Democratic India: Let’s Talk Misogyny. Social Scientist, 42(9/10): 49-61.
  11. Daly, K. (2017). Sexual violence and victims’ justice interests. In Restorative Responses to Sexual Violence. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315630595-7
  12. Dash, P. P. (2021). Feminism and Its Discontents: Punishing Sexual Violence in India. Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 28(1), 7-28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971521520974843
  13. Deer, S. & Barefoot, A. (2018). The limits of the state: Feminist perspectives on carceral logic, restorative justice and sexual violence. Kansas Journal of Law & Public Policy, 28(3): 505-526.
  14. Friedman, J. & Valenti, J. (2008). Yes Means Yes! Visions of Female Sexual Power and A World Without Rape. Basic Books.
  15. Groenhuijsen, M. (2016). Complexity of victims’ families position: Arguments against the death penalty as seen from a victimological perspective. In I. Simonovic (Ed.), Death penalty and the victims (pp. 22-40). United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights.
  16. Gruber, A. (2009). Rape, Feminism, and the War on Crime. Washington Law Review, 84(4), 581-660.
  17. Gurnham, D. (2016). A critique of carceral feminist arguments on rape myths and sexual scripts. New Criminal Law Review, 19(2), 141-170. https://doi.org/10.1525/ nclr.2016.19.2.141
  18. Henderson, H. (2007). Feminism, Foucault, and Rape: A Theory and Politics of Rape Prevention. https://doi. org/10.15779/Z38M90226M
  19. Herman, J. L. (2005). Justice from the victim’s perspective. Violence Against Women, 11(5), 571-602. https://doi. org/10.1177/1077801205274450 PMid:16043563
  20. Jacobs, M. S. (2017). The violent state: Black women’s invisible struggle against police violence. 24, 63.
  21. Kethineni, S., Srinivasan, M., & Kakar, S. (2016). Combating violence against women in india: Nari adalats and genderbased justice. Women & Criminal Justice, 26(4), 281-300. https://doi.org/10.1080/08974454.2015.1121850
  22. Kim, M. E. (2018). From carceral feminism to transformative justice: Women-of-color feminism and alternatives to incarceration. Journal of Ethnic & Cultural Diversity in Social Work, 27(3), 219-233. https://doi.org/10.1080/15313204.2018.1474827
  23. Manian, S. (2022). Is India’s rape crisis a recent phenomenon? At the crossroads of religious nationalism, caste, and gender. Sexualities, 13634607211051544. https://doi.org/10.1177/13634607211051545
  24. Maruna, S. (2004). Public opinion and community penalties. In S. A. Bottoms, S. Rex, & G. Robinson (Eds.), Alternatives to Prison: Options for an Insecure Society (pp. 83-113). Willan.
  25. McGlynn, C., & Westmarland, N. (2019). Kaleidoscopic justice: Sexual violence and victim-survivors’ perceptions of justice. Social & Legal Studies, 28(2), 179-201. https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663918761200
  26. Menon, N. (2012). Seeing Like a Feminist. Penguin UK. NCRB. (2020). Crime in India, Statistics Volume-1 [Government Publication]. Government of India. Retreived from: https://ncrb.gov.in/sites/default/files/ CII%202020%20Volume%201.pdf
  27. Orenstein, A. (2007). Special issues raised by rape trials symposium: Ethics and evidence: V. The use of prejudicial evidence. Fordham Law Review, 76(3), 1585-1608.
  28. Pemberton, A. (2011). Too Readily Dismissed? A Victimological Perspective on Penal Populism (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 2197428). Social Science Research Network. Retrieved from: https://papers.ssrn.com/ abstract=2197428
  29. Pemberton, A., Aarten, P. G. M., & Mulder, E. (2017). Beyond retribution, restoration and procedural justice: The big two of communion and agency in victims’ perspectives on justice. Psychology, Crime & Law, 23(7), 682-698. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2017.1298760
  30. Pemberton, A., & Reynaers, S. (2011). The controversial nature of victim participation: therapeutic benefits in victim impact statements (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 1745923). Social Science Research Network. https://doi. org/10.2139/ssrn.1745923
  31. Petrich, D. M., Pratt, T. C., Jonson, C. L., & Cullen, F. T. (2021). Custodial sanctions and reoffending: a metaanalytic review. Crime and Justice, 50(1), 353-424. https://doi.org/10.1086/715100
  32. Sahay, S. (2014). Man tries to molest woman, his sister gets raped as punishment. Hindustan Times. Retrieved from: https://www.hindustantimes.com/india/man-tries-tomolest- woman-his-sister-gets-raped-as-punishment/ story-WQ4wfi4eXnx8CGJw6MdTHL.html
  33. Samya-Centre for Equity Studies (New Delhi, I. & Rosa- Luxemburg-Stiftung. (2017). India exclusion report 2016. Satish, M. (2016). Discretion, Discrimination and the Rule of Law: Reforming Rape Sentencing in India. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/ CBO9781316471784
  34. Sered, D. (2017). Accounting for violence: How to increase safety and break our failed reliance on mass incarceration. Accounting for Violence, 38.
  35. Smart, C., & Sevenhuijsen, S. (1989). Child custody and the politics of gender. Routledge.
  36. Taylor, S. C., & Norma, C. (2012). The “Symbolic Protest” behind women’s reporting of sexual assault crime to police. Feminist Criminology, 7(1), 24-47. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085111420416
  37. Temkin, J., & Krahé, B. (2008). Sexual assault and the justice gap: A question of attitude (pp. xi, 257). Hart Publishing.
  38. Thakore, Shreena & TEDx Talks. (2015). It matters WHY you think rape Is wrong | Shreena Thakore | TEDxLSRCollege. Retrieved from: https://www.youtube. com/watch?v=Dy28zB9hBZc
  39. Tromadore, C. E. (2016). Police office sexual misconduct: An urgent call to action in a context disproportionately threatening women of color. Harvard Journal on Racial & Ethnic Justice, 32, 153-188.
  40. van Dijk, J., & Groenhuijsen, M. (2007). Benchmarking victim policies in the framework of european union law. 21.
  41. Verma, J. S., Seth, L., Subramanian, G., Committee, J. J. S. V., & Law, C. on A. to C. (2013). Report of the Committee on Amendments to Criminal Law. Retrieved from: http:// archive.nyu.edu/handle/2451/33614
  42. Walia, S. (2014). Two years since the Delhi gang rape, here’s what’s changed-and what hasn’t. Quartz. Retrieved from: https://qz.com/india/312738/two-years-since-thedelhi- gang-rape-heres-whats-changed-and-what-hasnt/
  43. White, D., & McMillan, L. (2021). [De]-Centering the victim: Police perceptions of victims of sexual violence through a comparative lens of evidence collection and processing. Feminist Criminology, 16(5), 680-700. https://doi. org/10.1177/15570851211031991